<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Proper Data Abstractions in .NET and Mono Applications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/2005/11/22/more-proper-data-abstractions-in-net-and-mono-applications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/2005/11/22/more-proper-data-abstractions-in-net-and-mono-applications/</link>
	<description>babblings of a computer loving fool</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jay R. Wren - lazy dawg evarlast &#187; Archive &#187; On : Downcasting is a Code Smell</title>
		<link>http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/2005/11/22/more-proper-data-abstractions-in-net-and-mono-applications/#comment-11717</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay R. Wren - lazy dawg evarlast &#187; Archive &#187; On : Downcasting is a Code Smell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://little.xmtp.net/blog/?p=534#comment-11717</guid>
		<description>[...] When I run into code like this I usually get VERY frustrated. It is never fun to run into ugly code. It is more frustrating to run into code that could be so much better with just slightly more than trivial understanding of the underlying libraries. I guess this is exactly what I wrote on with respect to System.Data over a year ago. Not the downcasting part, but rather just good use of the supplied interfaces instead of always using the concrete class. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When I run into code like this I usually get VERY frustrated. It is never fun to run into ugly code. It is more frustrating to run into code that could be so much better with just slightly more than trivial understanding of the underlying libraries. I guess this is exactly what I wrote on with respect to System.Data over a year ago. Not the downcasting part, but rather just good use of the supplied interfaces instead of always using the concrete class. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/2005/11/22/more-proper-data-abstractions-in-net-and-mono-applications/#comment-452</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://little.xmtp.net/blog/?p=534#comment-452</guid>
		<description>whatever... i know you wish you used java. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whatever&#8230; i know you wish you used java. <img src='http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
