Comments on: SOA is not a replacement for OO http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/2006/07/31/soa-is-not-a-replacement-for-oo/ babblings of a computer loving fool Mon, 21 Nov 2016 19:37:12 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.7.2 By: Jay R. Wren - lazy dawg evarlast » Archive » Domain Driven Design (DDD) and Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) are both important http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/2006/07/31/soa-is-not-a-replacement-for-oo/comment-page-1/#comment-9716 Thu, 09 Nov 2006 21:24:23 +0000 http://little.xmtp.net/blog/2006/07/31/soa-is-not-a-replacement-for-oo/#comment-9716 […] I don’t think I would use the word unrelated, but the are definitely NOT two different ways of thinking. I guess this is a pet peeve of mine. DDD is also not a replacement for Object Oriented Design. Rather, DDD “is a way of thinking and a set of priorities…” according to http://domaindrivendesign.org/. […]

]]> By: Jay R. Wren - lazy dawg evarlast » Archive » Nick Malik is right on - SOA is really just OO applied to distributed systems http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/2006/07/31/soa-is-not-a-replacement-for-oo/comment-page-1/#comment-9715 Thu, 09 Nov 2006 21:24:03 +0000 http://little.xmtp.net/blog/2006/07/31/soa-is-not-a-replacement-for-oo/#comment-9715 […] I just really liked when he wrote “SOA is really just OO applied to distributed systems”.  Yes yes yes!  Thank you!  Unlike what others read and think about SOA, Nick got it right.  I still say that Yogi got it wrong.  SOA is not a replacement for OO. […]

]]> By: Udi Dahan - The Software Simplist http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/2006/07/31/soa-is-not-a-replacement-for-oo/comment-page-1/#comment-5761 Sat, 05 Aug 2006 08:30:49 +0000 http://little.xmtp.net/blog/2006/07/31/soa-is-not-a-replacement-for-oo/#comment-5761 I have a podcast on this topic up on the Dr. Dobb’s Portal, “Does SOA mean the end of OO?” here:

http://www.ddj.com/188500437

]]>