Comments on: CI Factory with Subversion in a custom path http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/2007/07/20/ci-factory-with-subversion-in-a-custom-path/ babblings of a computer loving fool Mon, 21 Nov 2016 19:37:12 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.7.2 By: Jay Flowers http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/2007/07/20/ci-factory-with-subversion-in-a-custom-path/comment-page-1/#comment-29403 Wed, 25 Jul 2007 00:35:35 +0000 http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/2007/07/20/ci-factory-with-subversion-in-a-custom-path/#comment-29403 Hi Jay W.,
After going back to correct the issue I find that it is in fact like the 15th sentence in the Install guide.

I would still like to understand your experience better.

Thanks Again,
Jay F.

]]> By: Jay Flowers http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/2007/07/20/ci-factory-with-subversion-in-a-custom-path/comment-page-1/#comment-29389 Mon, 23 Jul 2007 22:33:51 +0000 http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/2007/07/20/ci-factory-with-subversion-in-a-custom-path/#comment-29389 Hi Jay W.,
That is a shame. 🙁
You are right that the docs should tell you that by default it will push everything to you SCM. I guess I have forgotten or assumed that everyone has watched the DotNetRocks screencast, it shows this behavior. If the script did not write to your SCM you would have to import it yourself. So I would guess that your real issue is that you don’t want that structure and or content in your SCM. If this is true I would ask you to think about why it is a bad idea and why it is a good idea.

So your deal breaking issue for using CI Factory is what exactly? I ask not in confrontation but from the desire to better the product.

Smiles,
Jay F.

]]>