<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Funny .NET Graphics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/2007/11/24/funny-net-graphics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/2007/11/24/funny-net-graphics/</link>
	<description>babblings of a computer loving fool</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 03:52:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Holmes</title>
		<link>http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/2007/11/24/funny-net-graphics/comment-page-1/#comment-30030</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/2007/11/24/funny-net-graphics/#comment-30030</guid>
		<description>Jay, 

Two things - first, I&#039;m with you but help me here and create the visual that accurately represents the frameworks and breaks them out into versions at the same time. 

Second, do you think that we should break it out by version in one graphic or should we do 4 different graphics, .NET 1.0, .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0 and .NET 3.5? 

Josh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay, </p>
<p>Two things &#8211; first, I&#8217;m with you but help me here and create the visual that accurately represents the frameworks and breaks them out into versions at the same time. </p>
<p>Second, do you think that we should break it out by version in one graphic or should we do 4 different graphics, .NET 1.0, .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0 and .NET 3.5? </p>
<p>Josh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

