Comments on: The Fastest Readable Xml http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/2008/05/17/the-fastest-readable-xml/ babblings of a computer loving fool Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:52:58 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Jay R. Wren - lazy dawg evarlast » Blog Archive » Using xmllint because xml still sucks http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/2008/05/17/the-fastest-readable-xml/comment-page-1/#comment-30648 Jay R. Wren - lazy dawg evarlast » Blog Archive » Using xmllint because xml still sucks Fri, 06 Jun 2008 19:11:47 +0000 http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/2008/05/17/the-fastest-readable-xml/#comment-30648 [...] already mentioned how to get human readable xml from the non-human [...] [...] already mentioned how to get human readable xml from the non-human [...]

]]> By: jrwren http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/2008/05/17/the-fastest-readable-xml/comment-page-1/#comment-30647 jrwren Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:17:51 +0000 http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/2008/05/17/the-fastest-readable-xml/#comment-30647 yes, totally. I didn't mean to pick on blogs.msdn.com. It was just the first example I ran across. yes, totally. I didn’t mean to pick on blogs.msdn.com. It was just the first example I ran across.

]]> By: Josh Holmes http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/2008/05/17/the-fastest-readable-xml/comment-page-1/#comment-30646 Josh Holmes Fri, 06 Jun 2008 11:10:57 +0000 http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/2008/05/17/the-fastest-readable-xml/#comment-30646 My guess is that the guys that wrote the MSDN blog engine agree with you that humans shouldn't be reading XML - applications should. Therefore, they are far less concerned about the formatting of the XML than other blog engines who obviously expect people to read their XML so go through the trouble of pretty printing it. Sweet - you and Microsoft agree on something... ;) For the record, I love XML. But I don't think that humans should be reading it. The better it's working, the further behind the tools it should disappear. My guess is that the guys that wrote the MSDN blog engine agree with you that humans shouldn’t be reading XML – applications should. Therefore, they are far less concerned about the formatting of the XML than other blog engines who obviously expect people to read their XML so go through the trouble of pretty printing it. Sweet – you and Microsoft agree on something… ;)

For the record, I love XML. But I don’t think that humans should be reading it. The better it’s working, the further behind the tools it should disappear.

]]> By: Martin L. Shoemaker http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/2008/05/17/the-fastest-readable-xml/comment-page-1/#comment-30644 Martin L. Shoemaker Sun, 01 Jun 2008 20:14:08 +0000 http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/2008/05/17/the-fastest-readable-xml/#comment-30644 I also hate XML as a reader. But I find it necessary in lots of cases, and xmllint looks handy when that happens. Thanks! Off topic: Are you planning to use your door prize for the Kalamazoo UML Applied class on June 16? There's plenty of room left, but I need to start planning meals and handouts and stuff. I also hate XML as a reader. But I find it necessary in lots of cases, and xmllint looks handy when that happens. Thanks!

Off topic: Are you planning to use your door prize for the Kalamazoo UML Applied class on June 16? There’s plenty of room left, but I need to start planning meals and handouts and stuff.

]]>