Comments on: double.IsNaN is 100 times slower http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/2010/02/05/double-isnan-is-100-times-slower/ babblings of a computer loving fool Mon, 21 Nov 2016 19:37:12 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.7.2 By: Craig Maloney http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/2010/02/05/double-isnan-is-100-times-slower/comment-page-1/#comment-31231 Sat, 06 Feb 2010 06:39:41 +0000 http://jrwren.wrenfam.com/blog/2010/02/05/double-isnan-is-100-times-slower/#comment-31231 And eventually someone will run into this when they’re busily working with incredibly large numbers, and wonder why in the hell they’re coming back NaN. Creative.

]]>